CHICAGO (SCS) — This can be a program meant to ease the monetary pressure created by the pandemic, however one landlord contacted us to say that in her case, town’s emergency rental help program had accomplished the opposite.
Two weeks in the past we shared his story, and now we’ve an replace from the Chicago Division of Housing, which blames the federal authorities.
. After her father handed away final summer season, she grew to become the proprietor of her West Garden residence.
She stated that’s when the upstairs tenant stopped paying. Months handed and not using a lease verify, so she and the tenant utilized for Chicago’s Emergency Rental Help Program. Finger hoped this could cowl his losses.
“I’ve paperwork displaying, congratulations, I’ve been accepted,” she instructed CBS 2.
However she says the verify for $6,300 of your taxpayers cash that was speculated to bear her identify went to the deadbeat tenant as a substitute.
“I simply don’t perceive how they may ship him my verify when he hasn’t paid his payments for all these months. It’s unbelievable,” she stated.
We contacted town’s housing division to search out out why the verify went to the tenant, not Finger, and so they ultimately returned our emails after our unique story aired. They stated it was as a result of Finger offered the home late final yr.
“I simply suppose it’s a bit unusual that I didn’t know that if I offered the home, that I wouldn’t get the cash, it will go to him. I by no means would have even utilized,” Finger stated. .
The Division of Housing spokesman couldn’t say whether or not this warning for landlords was included within the software paperwork for emergency rental help. We definitely couldn’t discover it within the on-line Ceaselessly Requested Questions.
Metropolis officers have accused the US Treasury Division of setting the foundations for the Emergency Rental Help Program, which say it doesn’t matter if Finger requested for again lease, which she paid earlier than promoting. the Home. The feds stated the verify needs to be addressed to somebody linked to that deal with, and town listened. So as a substitute of saving it or giving it away, they gave taxpayers’ cash to somebody who was intentionally not paying lease.
“The story reported by CBS 2 was some of the egregious examples I do know of,” stated Kristopher Anderson of the Chicago Affiliation of Realtors. “It’s a yeoman’s job town is attempting to do, however we’re disenchanted they missed an amazing alternative to do it in a quicker, extra streamlined manner.”
Anderson stated his group and different housing advocacy teams desire a say in shaping these emergency rental help guidelines, hoping to keep away from such crimson tape. do happen.
“I might ask town and the bureaucrats within the metropolis to take a look at this not solely attempting to get the cash out, but additionally within the fiduciary curiosity of constructing certain the cash goes to the fitting particular person,” he stated.
Finger stated that in his case, that was not the case. In order that’s $6,300 and months of frustration that she’ll by no means get again.
“That one who lived in the home and nonetheless is doesn’t deserve that cash. To be rewarded for not paying lease sends a really unhealthy message to town,” she stated.
In an e-mail, the Division of Housing instructed Finger that she might rent a lawyer to attempt to get well her cash from this tenant, however at this level Finger stated she had already spent and misplaced sufficient cash. cash on this situation.